AttentionPublic discussionLemmy
Attention rose sharply
3.5× its usual variation — much larger than usual
+4 mentionsup over the last 24 hours
Nuclear weapons
Attention around Nuclear weapons is about usual, and has risen over the last 24 hours.
ConflictGLOBAL
Signals
- Attention61about usual+8.8 ptsup over 24 hours
09:0012:0015:0018:0021:0000:0003:0006:00
10-2610-2710-2810-2910-3010-3111-01
10-0810-1510-2210-29
Each source’s own reading, on the same scale as the figure above
- 85unusually highPublic discussionLemmy
- 54about usualPublic discussionMastodon
- 53about usualSearch & activityWikimedia Pageviews (Analytics API)
- 50about usualPublic discussionHacker News
- 50about usualSearch & activityFuture Index internal search and pageviews
Medium confidence0.41Up to date5 sourcesSearch & activity2Public discussion3
What moved
The largest movements across forecasts, attention, discussion sentiment and reporting in the last 24 hours, each compared with how much that topic usually moves.
8 changes were compared.
Across signals
No relationships between signals were detected this week. Checked 1 topic: 1 had a forecast contract moving well outside its usual range and 0 had unusually high public attention, and none of them showed a second layer doing something measurable at the same time.
What was reported
Occurrences reported on this topic, the most widely reported first. One entry per occurrence, however many outlets carried it, and the count on each is the outlets that reported it independently.
Nothing was reported on Nuclear weapons in the last 7 days.
What people are discussing
Posts and shared links on the discussion platforms this site reads that are about this topic, over the last two days, the most discussed first. Titles are the platform's own. Counts are the platform's where it publishes them, and otherwise the comments or shares this site read; none of it is a figure this site calculates.
2 more posts — show them
Forecast contracts
One row per source's own question. These are listed side by side for comparison and are not combined into a single figure — each source is answering its own question, in its own words.
- 7%unlikely±0.0 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
- 6%unlikely+0.8 ptsup over the last 24 hours
Sources
5 contributing sources — view breakdown
Attention
- Hacker NewsPublic discussion20%50.0
- Future Index internal search and pageviewsSearch & activity10%50.0
- LemmyPublic discussion20%85.4
- MastodonPublic discussion20%54.4
- Wikimedia Pageviews (Analytics API)Search & activity30%52.9
How the attention figure is calculated · method version 3.0.0 · What these figures do not say
Readers' discussion on this site
Comments from readers of this site, newest first. They are opinions, not a measurement: no figure on this page is computed from them.
Thank you — a moderator will look at it.
A comment is 1 to 2,000 characters.
Log in to do that.
That topic does not accept comments.
That comment no longer exists.
Too many attempts in a short time. Wait a little and try again.
Writing is paused for a moment. Try again in a few minutes.
The site could not complete that just now. Try again in a few minutes.
No comments yet.