Elon Musk
Attention around Elon Musk is below usual, and has fallen over the last 24 hours.
TechnologyGLOBAL
Signals
- Attention35below usual−2.7 ptsdown over 24 hoursOne reading so far
10-2610-2710-2810-2910-3010-3111-01
10-0810-1510-2210-29
Each source’s own reading, on the same scale as the figure above
- 42below usualSearch & activityFuture Index internal search and pageviews
- 39below usualPublic discussionLemmy
- 38below usualPublic discussionHacker News
- 37below usualSearch & activityWikimedia Pageviews (Analytics API)
- 34below usualPublic discussionMastodon
Medium confidence0.45Up to date5 sourcesSearch & activity2Public discussion3
What moved
The largest movements across forecasts, attention, discussion sentiment and reporting in the last 24 hours, each compared with how much that topic usually moves.
Nothing moved beyond its usual range over this window. 16 measurements were compared.
16 changes were compared.
Across signals
No relationships between signals were detected this week. Checked 1 topic: 0 had a forecast contract moving well outside its usual range and 0 had unusually high public attention, and none of them showed a second layer doing something measurable at the same time.
What was reported
Occurrences reported on this topic, the most widely reported first. One entry per occurrence, however many outlets carried it, and the count on each is the outlets that reported it independently.
The staggering $446m Elon Musk has spent on the US midterms – visualized opens in a new tab
1 independent origin · low confidence
The Guardian
1 independent origin · low confidence
CNBC
1 independent origin · low confidence
CNBC
5 further occurrences on this page — show them
1 independent origin · low confidence
NPR
Elon Musk is ‘truly a genius,’ says Vladimir Putin opens in a new tab
1 independent origin · low confidence
TechCrunch
1 independent origin · low confidence
CNBC
Elon Musk is a 'real genius', Putin says after satellite talks with SpaceX boss opens in a new tab
1 independent origin · low confidence
BBC News
1 independent origin · low confidence
MarketWatch
What people are discussing
Posts and shared links on the discussion platforms this site reads that are about this topic, over the last two days, the most discussed first. Titles are the platform's own. Counts are the platform's where it publishes them, and otherwise the comments or shares this site read; none of it is a figure this site calculates.
Elon Musk Made Off With $16 Billion of Taxpayer Money opens in a new tab
The staggering $446m Elon Musk has spent on the US midterms – visualized opens in a new tab
7 more posts — show them
The staggering $446m Elon Musk has spent on the US midterms – visualized opens in a new tab
Elon Musk Made Off with $16B of Taxpayer Money opens in a new tab
The staggering $446m Elon Musk has spent on the US midterms – visualized opens in a new tab
SpaceX loses bid to toss NAACP lawsuit over Memphis data center air pollution opens in a new tab
Forecast contracts
One row per source's own question. These are listed side by side for comparison and are not combined into a single figure — each source is answering its own question, in its own words.
- 4%very unlikely−0.5 ptsdown over the last 24 hours
- 18%unlikely±0.0 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
- 51%about even±0.0 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
6 further contracts on this topic — show them
- 67%somewhat likely±0.0 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
- 10%unlikely±0.0 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
- 0%very unlikely±0.0 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
- 17%unlikely±0.1 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
- 3%very unlikely±0.3 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
- 12%unlikely±0.0 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
Sources
5 contributing sources — view breakdown
Attention
- Hacker NewsPublic discussion20%38.1
- Future Index internal search and pageviewsSearch & activity10%41.7
- LemmyPublic discussion20%38.9
- MastodonPublic discussion20%34.5
- Wikimedia Pageviews (Analytics API)Search & activity30%36.8
How the attention figure is calculated · method version 3.0.0 · What these figures do not say
Readers' discussion on this site
Comments from readers of this site, newest first. They are opinions, not a measurement: no figure on this page is computed from them.
Thank you — a moderator will look at it.
A comment is 1 to 2,000 characters.
Log in to do that.
That topic does not accept comments.
That comment no longer exists.
Too many attempts in a short time. Wait a little and try again.
Writing is paused for a moment. Try again in a few minutes.
The site could not complete that just now. Try again in a few minutes.
No comments yet.