AI safety and evaluations
Attention around AI safety and evaluations is below usual, and has fallen over the last 24 hours.
AIGLOBAL
Signals
- Attention38below usual−2.0 ptsdown over 24 hoursOne reading so far
10-2610-2710-2810-2910-3010-3111-01
10-0810-1510-2210-29
Each source’s own reading, on the same scale as the figure above
- 50about usualSearch & activityFuture Index internal search and pageviews
- 50about usualPublic discussionLemmy
- 50about usualPublic discussionMastodon
- 42below usualPublic discussionHacker News
- 23very quietSearch & activityWikimedia Pageviews (Analytics API)
Low confidence0.38Up to date5 sourcesSearch & activity2Public discussion3
What moved
The largest movements across forecasts, attention, discussion sentiment and reporting in the last 24 hours, each compared with how much that topic usually moves.
Nothing moved beyond its usual range over this window. 5 measurements were compared.
5 changes were compared.
Across signals
No relationships between signals were detected this week. Checked 1 topic: 0 had a forecast contract moving well outside its usual range and 0 had unusually high public attention, and none of them showed a second layer doing something measurable at the same time.
What was reported
Occurrences reported on this topic, the most widely reported first. One entry per occurrence, however many outlets carried it, and the count on each is the outlets that reported it independently.
Nothing was reported on AI safety and evaluations in the last 7 days.
What people are discussing
Posts and shared links on the discussion platforms this site reads that are about this topic, over the last two days, the most discussed first. Titles are the platform's own. Counts are the platform's where it publishes them, and otherwise the comments or shares this site read; none of it is a figure this site calculates.
Nothing on the discussion platforms this site reads was about this topic in the last two days.
Forecast contracts
One row per source's own question. These are listed side by side for comparison and are not combined into a single figure — each source is answering its own question, in its own words.
- 81%likely±0.0 ptsunchanged over the last 24 hours
Related topics
Relations a person stated, each with a reason. Every topic keeps its own figures; nothing here is combined.
Sources
5 contributing sources — view breakdown
Attention
- Hacker NewsPublic discussion20%41.7
- Future Index internal search and pageviewsSearch & activity10%50.0
- LemmyPublic discussion20%50.0
- MastodonPublic discussion20%50.0
- Wikimedia Pageviews (Analytics API)Search & activity30%23.5
How the attention figure is calculated · method version 3.0.0 · What these figures do not say
Readers' discussion on this site
Comments from readers of this site, newest first. They are opinions, not a measurement: no figure on this page is computed from them.
Thank you — a moderator will look at it.
A comment is 1 to 2,000 characters.
Log in to do that.
That topic does not accept comments.
That comment no longer exists.
Too many attempts in a short time. Wait a little and try again.
Writing is paused for a moment. Try again in a few minutes.
The site could not complete that just now. Try again in a few minutes.
No comments yet.